Best Technical Achievement (Show Planner): Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Revision as of 21:40, 29 December 2013 view source Lloyd Wallis (7449) (talk \| contribs) 290 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 23:31, 13 January 2014 view source Andrew Durant (7448) (talk \| contribs) 42 edits mNo edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	URY's [[Show Planner]] Technology was entered into the 2013 [[Student Radio Awards]]. It was a successful entry, receiving ~~developer~~ [[Lloyd Wallis]] and ~~designer~~ [[Andy Durant]] a Silver award.		URY's [[Show Planner]] Technology was entered into the 2013 [[Student Radio Awards]]. It was a successful entry, receiving developers [[Lloyd Wallis]] and [[Andy Durant]] a Silver award.

	The feedback was largely positive, and the criticism was constructive and helpful, which was unexpected after the [[Less black and more graphics]] saga of 2012. The feedback was as expected in terms of whether it was the technical side that was actually the problem. However, it is incredibly interesting to see that the biggest obstacle was that commercial radio simply doesn't expect presenters to plan their shows, or the workflows are otherwise completely different to what you get in community radio.		The feedback was largely positive, and the criticism was constructive and helpful, which was unexpected after the [[Less black and more graphics]] saga of 2012. The feedback was as expected in terms of whether it was the technical side that was actually the problem. However, it is incredibly interesting to see that the biggest obstacle was that commercial radio simply doesn't expect presenters to plan their shows, or the workflows are otherwise completely different to what you get in community radio.